China: Retarding Creativity
by Adil Dhalla (@CreativityKTR)
Last week, I noticed that articles revisiting the Tiananmen Square Massacre and those reporting the blocking of more communication websites by the Chinese government we’re virtually on par with each other. Coincidentally, last week I also re-watched Across the Universe, a musical film set in the turbulent 1960s that uses songs by the Beatles to tell its story. You might be puzzled with how the two relate, but the connection should hopefully become apparent when considering creativity and communication.
At 1:20 of the trailer, Jude apologizes for his apparent apathy in the anti-war effort by claiming that while he wasn’t the man with a mega phone, he was communicating the message through his art. This didn’t seem to appease Lucy, who had just asserted that she would lie in front of a tank if it meant ending the war. My immediate thought was “would I lie in front of a tank if I needed to” to which I answered “if I had the right reason, I would”.
My ambiguity is not cowardly as much as it’s reflective of not being able to relate to the idea of things being that bad. While there are many things worth fighting for today, I have not personally encountered the type of things – tyranny, revolution, invasion, prejudice – which others have historically faced or are currently facing in spheres of the world far different than mine. All things considered, I have unconsciously enjoyed the sheltered life that my beautiful country has afforded me.
So having answered that, sort of, the next thing which fascinated me about that particular scene in the movie and the Chinese Government’s (henceforth ‘China’) actions was regarding communication. Lucy did not see that Jude’s ‘megaphone’ was his paintbrush and China sees liberal communication as a threat rather than an opportunity. Both are dead wrong.
Although China’s actions were not related to the recession, their decision speaks volumes about why their country will struggle and why we’re at a significant advantage. By inhibiting any forms of communication, China is retarding creativity. By creating barriers to communicate and collaborate, China is preventing itself from growing beyond the Manufacturing Age. Let’s even disregard for the moment social media sites that were blocked like Youtube, Flickr and Twitter and concentrate on Hotmail. How can people be encouraged (let alone be enabled) to create if they can’t communicate?
Recently, many people have compared western governments’ intervention in the economy to that of China’s arguing that we are moving away from the era of free capitalism and towards a more China-like approach. Enter socialism fear-mongering. I contest that it’s not socialism as much as its survival. Had our government not propped up certain industries and become the main instigator for new jobs, what would have happened to our economy? It was survival and the economic alignment with China, therefore, is temporary because our ability to be creative and debate freely will always ultimately differentiate our sphere from theirs.
When playing a part to kill the recession, remember the asset of free communication and all the things, like creativity, which are a by-product of this. There are no limits to how we can communicate and it goes well beyond social media and the internet. For Jude it was painting and in this absolute must see video, it was dancing. For Richard Florida and Kevin Stolarick, the Martin Prosperity Institute provides a well connected channel to evangelize the rise of the Creative Class. For Bruce Mau, the Institute without Boundaries is a brilliant way to communicate the power of design, creativity and people to a young audience.
The point is: there are no limits or boundaries to how you can communicate, create and collaborate. It sounds simple but depending where you live, it’s far from the case.
4 Comments
1 Milan Davidovic wrote:
o, on one hand it would appear to be to our advantage to have China fall behind in the “creativity race”. On the other hand, however, whatever drags them down drags us down, at least to the extent to which we’ve thrown in our lot with theirs. Inhabiting the same planet as we do, some degree of interdependence is inevitable.
But how to work with them — that’s the interesting question.
[Reply]
Adam Reply:
August 17th, 2009 at 3:55 pm
Absolutely in agreement with your interconnected point.
I look forward to hearing what others have to say at tonight’s Creative Club.
See you there.
[Reply]
2 Noor wrote:
I agree that China practices a heavy degree of censorship (most media outlets must be state owned, but this trend is slowly changing because privatization is creeping in and the internet is proving problematic to control). http://www.cfr.org/publication/11515/
However, I am more troubled by the “facade” of freedom afforded to residents of other countries. I currently live in the UK which is increasingly becoming a “surveillance society” UK citizens are caught on CCTV an average of 300 times a day and are subject to “dataveillance” through the use of credit card, mobile phone and loyalty card information, and CCTV.
If we’re talking purely about creativity, I don’t think China’s censorship is at the degree where it would stunt original entrepreneurship. We should keep in mind that our activities in “free societies” are also monitored and we still may be working within the confines of a neo-liberal agenda. This inception starts from our schools.
Is either society “free”?
On a slightly different note, you must watch this video on creativity:
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.html
[Reply]
3 Non wrote:
This looked like a good read but I honestly couldnt be bothered because the black on blue thin text is so hard to read.
[Reply]
4 adil wrote:
That’s really too bad. We actually initially went with blue to a) stand out and b) because its the color which is supposed to inspire creativity the most.
I wonder if your just accustomed to every other website in the world having a white background (which is done for very valid reasons) or we’re just being naive and should get with the white background. We could also mess with the font.
Thanks for the sort of suggestion
[Reply]
One Trackback